Wed, Mar 11, 2:26 AM CDT

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny, Wolfenshire

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2026 Jan 02 10:16 am)



Subject: Caravaggio. Was he a cheat?


Jack Casement ( ) posted Wed, 11 March 2009 at 8:21 AM · edited Sun, 22 February 2026 at 8:09 AM

It has been disclosed that the Italian Master painter Caravaggio used an early form of photography to project images of his subjects on to a canvas and then painted over them.  It is claimed that the 16th century artist used modern darkroom techniques to create his work, 200 years before photography was invented.  Apparently this explains why most of his subjects were painted as being left-handed because the image was projected reversed.  It was David Hockney  who stated that many old masters used optical instruments to compose their paintings.  It is claimed that Caravaggio used many substances including mercury and fireflies to fix the image.  and that the continued use of mercury could have explained his violent temper.
I have already read that some modern day painters use image projection to set the layout and scale of their pictures, but I am amazed that the whole business started over 400 years ago.


durleybeachbum ( ) posted Wed, 11 March 2009 at 11:29 AM

Hockneys demonstration on TV of this was wonderful!
Definitely not cheating, we were all shown the technique at art school!


girsempa ( ) posted Wed, 11 March 2009 at 6:35 PM

What's more: some close studies clearly show the use of a technique that's very similar to what we now know as 'Lens Blur' or 'Bokeh' in a number of 15th century paintings (including some of Jan Van Eyck, 1390-1441)...


We do not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs ǝʍ
 


danob ( ) posted Wed, 11 March 2009 at 6:37 PM · edited Wed, 11 March 2009 at 6:38 PM

Yes I  read this in the Telegraph today  I would say that he was just ahead of the game, and some time well before Photography..  I have used pinhole camera's and it is fun even if it is upside down...  The wizards also had ways with paint making that few others were able to emulate..

It is also clear that some of the perfection in perspective could only be possible with these techniques..

Danny O'Byrne  http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt


girsempa ( ) posted Thu, 12 March 2009 at 5:34 AM

For the sake of historical truthfulness, l think I may have to correct my earlier reply: I thought I remembered a lecture on the use of lens blur in the paintings of Jan Van Eyck, but after reflection I think it was in fact Jan (Johannes) Vermeer who used this technique... and that was 1.5 centuries later.
My apologies for my failing memory... ;o)


We do not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs ǝʍ
 


Garlor ( ) posted Wed, 18 March 2009 at 8:21 AM

There is only one form of cheating in art and that is the copying of anothers work and that is called forgery. Everything else is fair game and for years I have realised that many photo realistic paintings are  copies of a photo projected onto the canvas and sketched then painted.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.