Filter: Safe | Mon, Jun 1, 12:20 PM CDT

Computer Corruption and how to Avoid it...<i>or Whose Responsibility is it Anyway?</i>

Feb 23, 2006 at 12:00 am by nickcharles


Computer Corruption and how to Avoid it...or Whose Responsibility is it Anyway? I recently purchased a magazine because of the free software on it, which was supposed to be fully functional. I wanted to experiment with it. To make a long story short, it didn't work properly. Now I was left with it on my machine. In a perfect world, all programs would work perfectly. If you had to remove one, you could remove it thoroughly and cleanly, registry and all. However, this is not a perfect world. I liken my Operating System to an octopus; it has its tentacles in everything, and even when a program is removed, some of it might still remain. Or worse than that, I might remove something critical to another program, such as a .dll that is used by both or a newer .dll that replaced an older one and now has vanished forever. Since I review graphic software, I feel a special responsibility to keep my two computers as clean as possible, so if a program doesn't work as is stated I do not confuse it with computer corruption. If I find I am having problems with an aspect of a program, I initially check many forums to see if the problem is general, or mine alone before contacting the company. I have experienced a problem on one machine and not the other that turned out, for example, to have to do with an interaction of a video card. The cards in the two machines are different. Any way, I don't want to digress from the topic that I planned to address. What responsibility, if any, should the computer user take to insure that problems with software are not a result of a corrupted system? How much should a user have to know about a computer when they purchase it? I have found over many years of experience that one problem has the potential of multiplying into many problems. I used to redo my systems at least every 6 months. For the past few years I have used a program called "Ghost" and it has saved me countless hours. It is not a perfect program. I have found some tiny discrepancies when I have "Ghosted" back a program, but never anything that was a system problem. Symantec Ghost is a backup/restore program. I use an older version or I would describe the newest one in more detail. Basically, one backs up a drive or a partition and then restores it. Ghost can also perform other tasks, but I use it strictly for backup/restore purposes. To go back to the example I gave in the beginning of this commentary, which prompted me to write this article. Since I could not get the software on the CD from the magazine to work properly, I wanted to remove the program completely from my computer. It was not a problem. I just Ghosted back to the version before I installed the program. On one of my machines it is straight forward, on the other one which has a raid, I have to use a floppy disc as well as the Ghost CD. But the process takes only about 15 minutes total on the more complicated machine. This also works perfectly if an update to a program turns out to be corrupt. Yes, this has happened to me with more than one company. But with Symantec Ghost, it is merely an annoyance. Now, getting back to the topic, I am sure some people will claim that by having the ability to remove the corrupted version or malfunctioning software, companies will not be as careful in their releases. I have seen comments like this in various forums and I am not taking any position but my own, which has to do with what I do with my computers. Getting back to the topic: How much responsibility should a computer user take to try to keep a "bug free" system in this imperfect world? I sometimes feel that I spend more time keeping my computers maintained, than I do using them! Note: Please do not flame, name or comment about any one company. That is not the object or intent of this article.
Message2463414.jpg
  • The Paula Sander's Report is a regular Renderosity Front Page featured column, where Paula investigates and comments on graphic software, techniques, and other relevant material through her reviews, tutorials, and general articles.
February 27, 2006
Sections: Archives

Comments

or Register to post a comment



Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.