Following Schrodinger's Cat for Vyctoria by mgtcs

Poser • Surrealism • posted on Sep 09, 2012

Open full image in new tab Zoom on image

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.

Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

No AI - This artwork was created entirely by hand or with traditional digital tools.

Description

Credits: Victoria 4.2 from Daz Studio Character by Vyctoria Thiery at Runtime dna Outfit By RPublishing Background Background by me with DMR's DreamArt 2 Cats by JaneEden Thanks for your comments on my previous image!

Congratulations Vyctoria, Rhiannon, Marforno, Danie and RPublishing for your hight quality work. Something a little different from my usual style, hope you liked it. Thank you everybody for all your support and friendship and a hope I'm improving my work, so that I will not let you down! I wish you a marvelous week!

Production Credits

Mature Image Blocked

Image blocked according to your Max Maturity Rating : Safe

View Anyway Settings

Vindicator Suit for V4, A4, G4

By RPublishing

$14.95 USD

DMRs DreamArt 2

By DM

$18.00 USD 50% Off

$9.00 USD

Comments (158)

farmerC

2:59PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Exellente creation.

VEDES

3:38PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

As always amazing creation!!!!!!!!!!

drifterlee

4:22PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Gorgeous work, MOnica!!!!!

goodoleboy

6:17PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Wow, lots happening with the wizardlike environment and patterns in this striking image, my friend.

theprojectionist

6:52PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Looking good Monica.

jeroni

6:53PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Very nice character. Great lighting and pose! Really nice work

RodS

7:44PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Wonderful work, Monica! It's good to try something a bit different, and you got this perfect! I agree - those vendors are among the very best!

daggerwilldo

8:40PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Wow, I wonder if somehow you got the cat's eye view of the world. Magical and fun.

danapommet

8:48PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

a super zoom Monica and I love the glass globe in her hand. beautiful colors all around and I like her outfit!

HADCANCER

8:49PM | Mon, 10 September 2012

Shoot I was told there would be no tests to view renders here. OK... One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of the hour, one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges, and through a relay releases a hammer that shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts. It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks. —Erwin Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics), Naturwissenschaften (translated by John D. Trimmer in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society) Schrödinger's famous thought experiment poses the question, when does a quantum system stop existing as a superposition of states and become one or the other? (More technically, when does the actual quantum state stop being a linear combination of states, each of which resembles different classical states, and instead begins to have a unique classical description?) If the cat survives, it remembers only being alive. But explanations of the EPR experiments that are consistent with standard microscopic quantum mechanics require that macroscopic objects, such as cats and notebooks, do not always have unique classical descriptions. The thought experiment illustrates this apparent paradox. Our intuition says that no observer can be in a mixture of states—yet the cat, it seems from the thought experiment, can be such a mixture. Is the cat required to be an observer, or does its existence in a single well-defined classical state require another external observer? Each alternative seemed absurd to Albert Einstein, who was impressed by the ability of the thought experiment to highlight these issues. In a letter to Schrödinger dated 1950, he wrote: You are the only contemporary physicist, besides Laue, who sees that one cannot get around the assumption of reality, if only one is honest. Most of them simply do not see what sort of risky game they are playing with reality—reality as something independent of what is experimentally established. Their interpretation is, however, refuted most elegantly by your system of radioactive atom + amplifier + charge of gunpowder + cat in a box, in which the psi-function of the system contains both the cat alive and blown to bits. Nobody really doubts that the presence or absence of the cat is something independent of the act of observation.[4] Note that no charge of gunpowder is mentioned in Schrödinger's setup, which uses a Geiger counter as an amplifier and hydrocyanic poison instead of gunpowder. The gunpowder had been mentioned in Einstein's original suggestion to Schrödinger 15 years before, and apparently Einstein had carried it forward to the present discussion .....Ok I still don't know even after reading the answer. However it did lead to your amazing render. That I understand. I assume Vyctoria Under stood all of this, otherwise why would you torture her so?