American Express by intro
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
No AI - This artwork was created entirely by hand or with traditional digital tools.
Description
Thanks to the Supreme Court's Citizens United v F.E.C. decision, Money is speech.
From now on, the only voice you hear will be that of the rich.
If you'd like to do something about it, support:
movetoamend.org
Comments (3)
I just don´t buy their news. I read Z-Magazine. www.zcommunications.org But the decision is a shame. The US could need a reform of the election system, not more concentration of political and financial power.
Intro: HELLO! .... Methinks WE are witnessing the SELLING of OUR America .... .... FROM ALL sides! .... SIGHS. This OLD man sees OUR America becoming an OLIGARCHY .... RULE by a SELECT FEW .... He played the 'board game', MONOPOLY as a KID .... SADLY, the GAME is becoming REALITY and FAST ... SIGHS. This DUMB old INDEPENDENT thinker and voting PATRIOTIC CITIZEN had to SMILE when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a ''BUSINESS'' had the SAME identity/right as a LIVING, BREATHING CITIZEN of OUR America? .... Last time HE looked, SIMPLETON T.P. has YET to hear a WORD or receive a HUG from ANY 'business'. SMILES? And, IF said COURT is going to ALLOW a 'business' to have the SAME DESIGNATION as ONE U.S. CITIZEN< then ALLOW EACH business ONE VOTE ONLY. WINK? INDEPENDENTLY yours, TallPockets.
@TallPockets Yep. And IF said corporations are going to be accorded person-hood, then is not one person(Corporation)owning another person(Corporation) "slavery" and therefore illegal? What about(as in the case of the BP oil rig) when Corporations kill? Do we FINE a killer? Perhaps we should all move to Delaware and incorporate as individuals. Then we could all live above the law. Heck we could even be like Supreme Court Justices! It still surprises me that you see this Aristocracy as being caused by both parties equally. Surely you can't compare the attitudes of a Bush with those of an Obama. Or A Boener with a Pelosi. Or justify the conduct of the Republican appointees of the now defunct Supreme Court. Esteemed colleague: Please show me what I'm not seeing? DO you REALLY think both sides share equal blame? Sometimes "Facts" have a liberal bias. Perhaps it's just my aging eyes, yes?