Forum Moderators: tim, ebasham, TimaC Forum Coordinators: msansing
MarketPlace Customers F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2026 Sep 21 12:05 pm)
Contact and Support Information:
To reach our Marketplace staff, please open a support ticket at
support.renderosity.com
Our goal is to respond to support tickets within 24 hours, 7 days a week.
Something I have come across that is a bit disturbing to me - https://www.renderhub.com/dreamlight/aire-ai-render-engine-daz-studio
The comfy software is free to download, but if you plan to use it on a regular base, it will cost you a subscription.
So much stuff is leaning towards AI. I wonder if using AI is equal to pirating some ones information.
Unsurprisingly, this has only gotten worse. For example https://www.renderosity.com/marketplace/products/172644/ventilation-shaft-for-poser
Is there even a single preview image without AI? If so, I can't tell, which means I can't tell what I would actually be getting. I can't buy a product that way, it's not helping anyone.
This is the first product from 1971 to feature AI rendering. None of his previous products feature AI rendering. In my opinion, he should have included (as he usually does) a rendering with separate geometry.
You really need to require that images are individually marked as AI. Otherwise the store is simply not trustworthy.
I'm not an anti-AI freak, but using only AI images in promos is really bad... Even before AI, I've always been for having at least a few images of the product, isolated and in neutral light, so you know what you're buying... But I guess this AI thing is only blowing what always happened -- misleading promos. I've bought a few characters that look amazing in promos but, when you load it... Well... Disappointing, to say the least... So, I'll just adopt the same cautious approach I've always had...
P.S.: And no... Using AI is not equal to "pirating someone's information." The same rules against plagiarism should apply for both human and AI creation, so, if you can't prove plagiarism, same rules apply. And all true artists know the maxim, "steal from one person, and it's plagiarism; steal from many, and it's research." Everyone who believes that one or someone else creates art "ex nihilo" is completely deluded. Everyone creates from what one has learned and experienced with all the senses. What counts is how you transform it and create something new therefrom. Of course, there's a lot of AI generic "art" -- but so there is human's.
@ChromeStar-If you buy a thing and it's not as advertised, you should review it so other people can see.
Does this fall within the realm of negative criticism? I was under the impression Rendo only wanted positive reviews for the vendors. Sometimes telling the truth about a product is not a good thing for the vendor.
This is the first product from 1971 to feature AI rendering. None of his previous products feature AI rendering. In my opinion, he should have included (as he usually does) a rendering with separate geometry.I bought it (Daz version) just to see what it looks like. Not surprisingly, it doesn't look like the ai promos, but not bad. I'm not returning it. I'll just consider it a saving since that's my last 1971s purchase.
ChromeStar posted at 6:39 PM Wed, 19 August 2026 - #4509598
Done: hereIf you buy a thing and it's not as advertised, you should review it so other people can see.
arifzhafir posted at 4:01 PM Tue, 18 August 2026 - #4509530I always considered his promos as artistic rather than render-representative anyway. But the fact that they were all marked as ai and looked so much better than I would've expected from a mildly Photoshopped render, took me aback. I'm not unhappy with the product, and I would've had to do a lot of work to bring it up to standard regardless of the promo.This is the first product from 1971 to feature AI rendering. None of his previous products feature AI rendering. In my opinion, he should have included (as he usually does) a rendering with separate geometry.I bought it (Daz version) just to see what it looks like. Not surprisingly, it doesn't look like the ai promos, but not bad. I'm not returning it. I'll just consider it a saving since that's my last 1971s purchase.
arifzhafir posted at 2:33 PM Thu, 20 August 2026 - #4509621
RAGraphicDesign posted at 4:35 AM Thu, 20 August 2026 - #4509617I have some renders in my gallery made using his products.arifzhafir posted at 4:01 PM Tue, 18 August 2026 - #4509530I always considered his promos as artistic rather than render-representative anyway. But the fact that they were all marked as ai and looked so much better than I would've expected from a mildly Photoshopped render, took me aback. I'm not unhappy with the product, and I would've had to do a lot of work to bring it up to standard regardless of the promo.This is the first product from 1971 to feature AI rendering. None of his previous products feature AI rendering. In my opinion, he should have included (as he usually does) a rendering with separate geometry.I bought it (Daz version) just to see what it looks like. Not surprisingly, it doesn't look like the ai promos, but not bad. I'm not returning it. I'll just consider it a saving since that's my last 1971s purchase.
Look over there! He is returning with the boat
These are in Poser.
GGreen posted at 4:02 AM Thu, 20 August 2026 - #4509602
I don't see why that would be my concern. If reviews can only be positive, they have no value.@ChromeStar-If you buy a thing and it's not as advertised, you should review it so other people can see.
Does this fall within the realm of negative criticism? I was under the impression Rendo only wanted positive reviews for the vendors. Sometimes telling the truth about a product is not a good thing for the vendor.
I mean, no need to be malicious, you ought to be accurate and the review should be about the product and not some tangential issue, but "product didn't resemble marketing copy" is entirely appropriate feedback if you ask me.
What if you purchase a product that was made with AI and it is not stated. You use the product and upload it to your gallery or in a Rendo contest not knowing it was made with AI and therefore you select the option pertaining to No Al. Does this mean you are being deceptive? With this thought in mind, I think Rendo needs to add an option for us to choose that states we are unaware if the product(s) uses anything made with AI.
I do not willingly use AI.I see https://www.renderosity.com/marketplace/products/172684/ever-hungry is trying to address that by marking their preview explicitly as not AI. Which I respect but relying on the artists to each respond to a lack of rules in their own ways is going to make an incoherent marketplace.
Regarding 1971s, I like their style a lot. I have 82 of their products, it's not about that. I'm still not going to buy something with no honest previews.
Yes, sadly, it's why I've been buying the old stuff, and no new stuff. I used to like Powerage, Shreddder, etc... but I can't trust the content will look good, and then there is the whole fact that why I used to buy products has been replaced by AI, soooo... I only buy things to treat myself once in a while. I really value the artists who create products without AI. To you, I say bravo.
Also, thank you to Renderosity for making AI labeling a thing. I have pretty much quit DAZ3d because they haven't done that at all.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Unsurprisingly, this has only gotten worse. For example https://www.renderosity.com/marketplace/products/172644/ventilation-shaft-for-poser
Is there even a single preview image without AI? If so, I can't tell, which means I can't tell what I would actually be getting. I can't buy a product that way, it's not helping anyone.
You really need to require that images are individually marked as AI. Otherwise the store is simply not trustworthy.