yvesab opened this issue on Mar 21, 2025 · 45 posts
pjz99 posted Mon, 31 March 2025 at 8:40 PM
A number of concepts in G9 are just baffling, I don't know why they went back to an androgynous base (but not really!) and the simple tube topology everywhere that utterly relies on high subdivision for any shape details, the dramatically higher vertex count of the base mesh, the even higher density in the feet (???) the dramatically different shape of the head, the different base pose
it feels like a direct, angry response to pretty much everything good about the G8 figures ¯\_(ツ)_/¯