I call her "New TOS" by wolfie ()
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
My comment on the new and improved TOS.
"We feel this is a positive move for the entire community. We apologize for any inconvenience and we hope you understand the value these changes will bring. Working together we can have the best Community possible!"
BS. Lawyers got involved in something that was just fine.
Here are some links you might enjoy that would VIOLATE the TOS here but aparently were acceptable for the last 500 years.
Titian, about 1750
Leonardo Da Vinci
Image Comments (11)
Star4mation () 1:19PM | Tue, 21 June 2005
Welcome, Wolfie. Some damn fine artwok links you have given us. I recomend everyone to take a look at these classic paintings!! Also thanks for the Bryce freebees on your web site, Ive used your bonemen in 3 of my images here at Renderosity!! Cheers, Steve
wolfie () 9:36PM | Tue, 21 June 2005
Parrish used nudes infrequently as I remember, but there is one painting I do remember at least partially. A boy or girl, can't remember, standing over what might be a sister, young mother or older lover (if the figure was a boy). Been a while since I saw the image. Was from the early 20's to 30's I think, not sure, been a long time since I was in school (lets just say its been at least 25yrs and leave it at that). I remember I didn't like his style much, other than the one image.
elizabyte () 10:01PM | Tue, 21 June 2005
You may actually be violating TOS by linking to those, though. Fine art? Not at Renderosity, thankyou! ;-)
wolfie () 2:59AM | Wed, 22 June 2005
Its a sad state of affairs when artists' images are judged on the perversions of others completely disconnected from the art. If a PIECE of art is perverse or lewd, then deal with that ONE PIECE, don't ban an entire genre because some up tight housemom saw a baby's butt. Click NEXT, move on. Last I checked we ALL were borne naked. Should we ban all red cars because a few people consider red a hostile color? Maybe we should ban all blue cars because someone saw a Da Vinci reprint in the back seat of one at the mall. We are headed there if not VERY careful.
AWC () 9:34AM | Wed, 22 June 2005
From what I've read so far there seems to be a very confused uptight loney person/persons here at renderosity. Art has been critized from our earliest times, always as a way to control the masses, and the artist has always survived thru the art...you see, people die but the artwork still is there for all to see. For those of you here at Renderosity attempting to control the artist community and creations remember that your God created the human form NOT YOU...if it be two feet tall or six feet tall dressed or running free in a field of flowers unclothed doesn't matter. Not to say humping like bunnies would not be ok on this site as young children do view here and they should take that art to the porn sites...there are plenty of those. But PLEASE...stop this crazy control of the creative mind...it is 2005 !!! Time to be awake and real with our world folks. Now I'm off with my 3 children and new digicam to take pics of them running thru a field of flowers (clothed)...haha hope you all have a blessed and beautiful day and come to a better end to this craziness. L
ptrope () 9:39AM | Wed, 22 June 2005
I find the entire Cubist movement terribly erotic; I can't believe you would have the audacity to flout the rules in such a way, trying to disguise it with the image of a child, just to place a clearly pornographic picture in this wholesome, non-threatening gallery! :-O