I think you'd have a good case if you asked DAZ to supply you with the file seperately (if you didn't want to upgrade to the full Dragon)_ if its on their sales description the 'goods' are incomplete without it. BTW if you can afford it do upgrade_ the full beasty is wonderful!Haven't fully explored it yet but there's a ton of morphs and the esipose dials (although they take a little getting used to) seem great.

Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/softgood.ez?ViewSoftgood=13450

Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/softgood.ez?ViewSoftgood=13451

Hi Richard! Yep I'm gonna have a go this w/e on the texture set for you.The Long Coat conforms well with Mike_ but as you see its quite closely applied so it does'nt hang away from the body like (we hope) Poser 5's dynamic cloth will! I like the look of your Henry Morgan too_the hat and boots are brilliant_I realize the hair/beard is post produced but if you could model that in P5 _ wooooh!

Must go and check out that hair/beard lead!!! I'll IM you once the pirates up, Nigel

Does the hair export out well to other programs ?(for example Bryce)It's quite big bucks but certainly looks stunning_ gives a great 'wild man' look. I'm gonna have to shift a few of these dress coat sets to get it on my download list! Back to work!

I hope so_ Ron Molina (who's testing for me) has just spotted a missing bump map file_ so I've just uploaded to him again and mailed him. So if the poor hard-pressed guy isn't too busy (and he doesn't find anything else) I'm hopeful. You could always get both sets ;-) he! he!

whooopa KUPA..super dooper__ sorry the excitements making me daft. I second all those cheers. I have to say that I for one have appreciated all the input that you and the CL team have put in to these forums over these last few months. Your excitement in the product and your willingness to engage in the community has said a lot about your philosophy. May CL and the team go form strength to strength. No doubt when we've all got our deliveries and had a chance to explore there be a lot of praise and I guess some moans but all that goes towards pushing the product forward.

What's the problem here!!! Ok its a drag having to go through this rigmarole_ BUT you know why its thought neccessary??!! Its because some arseholes out there think that free and warez stuff is somehow their god given right. And sure there will be hackers and other criminals out there who have the system cracked within days-but it'll stop the casual warez user who thinks he's doing no harm to anyone.Bullshit. The guys at CL have families and livings to make just like other decent folk.If the company thrives our community thrives. If its undermined by idiots who think a free copy is a great wheeze then we all lose.If you are going to boycott the product because the company is trying to protect your investment, well, more fool you. I for one am happy for CL to make sure that all users are legitimate(in both senses of the word!)

Attached Link: http://www3.mistral.co.uk/nigelpickering/index.html

Pleasure RsoL ! Sorry its not mapped or anything.(one of my v early models :-) )

Cath many thanks for this lovely texture and also for the collection of props which are superb. I see you are a plant studio enthusiast as well!(sorry off topic!)

User and vendor here. Its interesting the differing views here. I'm an inveterate downloader and guess like most of you have now got unmanageable directories. I think if it wasn't for the promise of library heaven in P5 I would be seriously thinking of converting to a categorised rather than artist based structure. We will see if P% makes things any easier. In defence of vendors I really don't think its an ego thing_ more a 'following convention' thing. But I think some of you guys have a valid gripe_ with the explosion of available stuff its getting out of hand! Leather_Guy, again this obj thing isn't a laziness issue.. Its that flipping Pro Pak that (I believe) recreates the obj. in the library structure..When I uploaded some of my earlier models (with my obj in 'geometries' I was informed by the tester that I should put my obj.'s in the library files. I had assumed (and carried on in blissful ignorance)that it did'nt make any practical difference, but am happy to be educated if anybodies got any comments.