MargyThunderstorm opened this issue on Jun 09, 2025 ยท 101 posts
bingomion posted Thu, 23 April 2026 at 4:53 AM
Rhia474 posted at 7:14 PM Wed, 22 April 2026 - #4505668
bingomion posted at 6:52 PM Wed, 22 April 2026 - #4505667I don't think you need to think that those commenting here aren't aware of this fact all too well. What we are objecting to is precisely the replacement part of the equation.I agree, if you're selling 3D assets you should show wire frame images.
I think all this AI labelling stuff is a waste of time, I doubt there's a business case for buying AI art at human made prices. And probably just a quick fix reactionary measure.
If people actually bothered to read some 3D AI tool promotion you would see that AI isn't an art tool but an Artist replacement, from concept to asset ready product.
I know, but obviously Bondware doesn't or doesn't care.
Technically, sellers must have proven IP ownership to license to Bondware. AI authorship can't be reliably attributed to a human, and it can't ensure proper compensation for the original artists whose work trained the models. So buyers take the legal risk not Bondware if assets are label correctly.
So I just see AI content on a store as a Lose:Lose situation.
You would think renderosity being in business for so long and having the great Poser legacy, that they would be vocal supporters of human Artist and creativity :/
If you don't laugh you cry lol
We are seeing Human-only, human-made, AI-free and no-AI spaces now so that's good.