Cascade777 posted at 6:37 PM Sat, 9 July 2022 - #4440986

randym77 posted at 4:58 PM Sat, 9 July 2022 - #4440979

Oh, and one thing to keep in mind...the US copyright office has determined that AI-created artwork cannot be copyrighted. 

Art does not need to be copyright protected ! No need to got to an office making a Copyright deposit , If the painting Image is unique, even a collage, place your signature on it and voila. Your signature is the copyright, does not matter if you used real paint, digital paint, a 3D App, else it would be the same thing with your digital artworks they all belong to Rendo, or lets say divided into the original creators of the mesh you used :) , the Painting would belong to the creator of the Paint, and on and on, nothing would belong to you. But I guess that is a little the American "megalomania" mentality. 

It is nice to see such ideas, the results, but not the mentality in these forums that on every little thing the words copyright appear . Like litte Gods that want to control all artists limiting them to ask for permission.

I think you would probably be okay if you didn't say the AI created the work.

The case in question, ruled on in February, hinged on a decision that only human-authored works qualify for copyright.

Something similar happened with a photo taken by a monkey, that went viral. The photographer whose gear was used could not keep it from being used by anyone who wanted to, because it was determined that the monkey took the photo and being non-human, could not copyright it.