Glitterati3D posted at 1:17PM Sat, 22 June 2019 - #4354161

Structure posted at 11:28AM Sat, 22 June 2019 - #4354157

It would appear that there are different schools of thought for the future, I for one agree with Laurie, content IS KING . Her SUGGESTIONS. and, that is all they are;; suggestions are as valid as anyone else's. Since poser is not hers to command, nor, does it belong to any of those people arguing with her. Poser's owners will decide which direction poser goes in, and that, is out of everyone else's control. Frankly, just because you do not like an idea, does not make it any less viable than your own ideas. I am sure that renderosity, being open-minded, and wanting poser to succeed are open to any and ALL suggestions, whether they fit with their current philosophy or not. So instead of arguing the validity ( or viability ) of an idea, why not let's embrace them all and work out ways that those ideas COULD improve poser. Let's be POSITIVE . After all - we poser users need it to work, and fighting about things that have been suggested is just too negative a start --- IMHO.

Nobody's fighting. We're having a discussion.

So, discussing making Poser DSToo is not a negative according to Earl.

But, discussing why that's not viable IS a negative according to Structure.

OK. Got it.

Well, splitting hairs here, but technically...

Discussing making Poser DStoo is just that...a discussion. Explaining why that's not viable is exactly what it's called... an argument. The problem is, that one side or the other tends to take things too far, and usually gets more than a little personal or take things to extremes. Like the person who thinks that not only should Genesis work in Poser, but the lighting is bad, Poser should be free and we should scrap the Superfly/Cycles renderer for Iray.