I have to say Gate, even this concept is dubious.

You make art sound incredibly selfish, a painter need not weave the carpets or grow the fruit in his painting to claim it his own creation. Nor stretch the canvases or bristle for his own brushes. Many of the great renaissance masters had teams of apprentices who worked side by side painting the masterpieces often at just the direction of the "Master". Ever seen a Kubrick, Spielberg or James Cameron film? I'm quite sure these guys weren't working alone in their garage with a camera on their shoulder smirking to themselves saying "It's mine, all mine!".

You see making art does not need to be an exercise in isolationism or totalitarian control, but can be a collaborative and most of all free expression of thought, and a manifestation of communication using whichever tools or muses that give you the most direct connection to your creativity. You say it's not really art or even belong to the artist, I say well what really is and what does? All of it and none of it, all based on a conversation between the creator and the viewer.