erogenesis opened this issue on Aug 14, 2013 · 71 posts
Glen posted Mon, 19 August 2013 at 11:45 AM
Quote - I don't have any concerns. If your female model is anatomically correct and I put clothes on her because I don't want to do a nude scene, guess what? she's not naked! If some people don't like it so what? Lost sales I doubt it, from my long experience of reading posts here, as in 10 yrs, the most vocal people are often the least likely to buy anyways.
My sentiments exactly! Unless you're going to try and create a second-skin or something, where the genitals would have to disappear, why the fuss about not having genitals on the figure? If you are trying to create a second-skin, perhaps it would be a good thing to have skin tight underwear that covers the genitals seamlessly and appears as part of the hip, or, as has been said, a removal morph.
I'm not all that keen on props and stuff... They never, ever work like they could and always have that underlying 'prop' feel to them. Lali's Bits is an awesome pruduct, best I've ever used, but even this keeps some of that 'proppyness' to it.
I would say that, if there is to be a detailed female figure with highly accurate genitals, it would be best to have a ton of options for it, morphs wise, and to include the same level of detail for the anus too. Also, if there's a female figure like that and no male figure... Well, that's sexist! Lol! :P
I'm running Win 10 Pro 32GB RAM Intel Core i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
My DA Gallery: glen85.deviantart.com/gallery
Peace, love and polygons!