Quote - Feel free to change the defaults in your own copy of it :).

re: Tolerances...

Just for future reference, you can't really compare tolerances used with your script with mine... 0.1 would be a huge (extremely loose) tolerance for my script.  I know you didn't say that you used it with mine, I'm just noting that the values may mean different things to each script.

re: Failure...

Yes, I'd really like to try your test-case to see what's going wrong.  I have an idea about the "skipped all together" issue, but I'd like to test it here.  I know that you're intimately familiar with operating your script (which I had little luck using) and the reverse is true as well, so I if I can figure out why your test-case is failing, that might help me adjust my instructions/description of the process for others.

Touché, indeed!  :lol:  :lol:

Yeh, sorry.  I wasn't comparing tolerances.  I was just giving the settings I used for good results.  You may not consider them "good", I don't know.  I think our standards differ significantly in such areas.  "Good" to me means, "looks better".  I get the idea that it may mean "more technically accurate", for you.  Which is fine, obviously.    :thumbupboth:

I'll PM you with the link.  I think the scalp shrinkage is something I'm seeing more than I suspect, with RD, but it stands out more here, because most of the higher-resolution mesh didn't move.  The worst areas are definitely better, as I said, but irregularities in the mesh grid are untouched and there's a really ugly bit where piggybacking took place in the lips, which isn't being corrected.

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.