Quote - Ok, I didn't get a lot of time to mess with this tonight, but I'm currently getting really good results using this one with your tutorial V2->Antonia setup (in both directions).  I'd be interested to see if it's doing any better in UpHill tests, if you get a chance...

Just drop in the new .pyd file and continue to call the newer CorrelateToNearVertList() routine - the changes are internal to that.

I'm eager to test it!  :woot:  Thank you.  Adding a secret process to the .pyd only has minimal utility, however.  This will need to be ported to mere Poser Python before any process can be fully integrated into the script.  Can you explain what changes have been made?

I'm not being down on the .pyd, of course.  It's simply wonderful!  :thumbupboth:  It just can't be used by everyone and it will break for everyone when Poser changes its version of Python.  Making the process fully reliant on the .pyd is not really a good idea, unless maybe Smith Micro would want to include the .pyd with Poser and a commitment was made to make sure it would always work.  I don't see that happening.  :lol:  Wish it would.  Poser really should have a built-in, compiled vector and matrix library for Python.  Numeric doesn't do everything, and recent versions of Poser don't even distribute the linear algebra module which Numeric requires for some applications.

I'm babbling.  You recognize all of this already.  Need more coffee.  :lol:

Thanks for all the work on this, Spanki.  :thumbupboth:  You're really moving this forward!  Seriously, don't let this interfere with your busy life.

I'll give it the uphill test with V3.

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.