Cage opened this issue on Feb 24, 2010 · 592 posts
odf posted Tue, 02 March 2010 at 8:18 PM
Quote - My thought was that the common shape will enable comparisons between any actors which have the reference shape prepared. I think processing through the reference shape actor as an intermediary would just add complications and the risk of distortion. That is, for actor A to actor B, if both share the shape of actor C, you'd compare A to B directly. Rather than run as A to C to B. Once the common shape is in place, it's a matter of comparing actors directly.
I think I should just stop talking at you. You're way ahead of me in these matters. Shaping A and B toward the reference actor and then doing the comparison and transfer between them directly is a much better idea than going through C explicitly.
That also means that the density of the reference mesh would be less of an issue. You wouldn't want lo-res Antonia, but anything sufficiently smooth to recognize the intended shape would in fact be fine.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.