I noticed that Kendra answered my question about objections to watermarks,

Their position consisted of the fact that they didn't like the "mess" .  

In order to highlight that false position, here are some equally fuzzy ideas ...

(1) [When I was a lad,] "We never locked our doors." 

(2) (While I was 'lost' in an unfamiliar part of Baltimore, MD) As I saw a
homeless person approaching on the nearby sidewalk, I locked the car
doors.  One of my passengers said, "They don't like it when you lock
your doors like that." 

(3) I drive a section of a bad road in my neighborhood at the legal speed
limit and get some hostility and aggression from other drivers.  e.g., In 15
the years of living here, I have been illegally passed at least 1000 times. 
While discussing this ongoing situation with a neighbor, she said,
"Have you considered the feelings of the drivers behind you?" 
I have to wonder, does she mean that I need to get some lawbreaker's
permission to drive safely and at the posted legal speed limit? 

Food for thought. 

My position to Garlor, Kendra, and anyone else with a similar concern,
is that you should do what you need to do in order to protect your property 
rights.  IMHO, you are free to ignore those who would compromise (or advise 
you to compromise) your rights. 

Comments???

--
Martin