Well said. Bryce6 could have a lot of potential, particularly if they provide support for direct vertex and face manipulation (i.e. a better modeler) along with their current boolean operations and metaballs. This would tend to end up making Bryce6 a conglomerate of several other programs. Also if they had a dynamics system attached for animation. Bryce's current animating capabilities are quite limited IMO. Although I have seen some amazing things done with it, you just can't beat equations! =) Cheers