jo3l opened this issue on Jun 16, 2004 ยท 12 posts
jo3l posted Thu, 17 June 2004 at 5:15 AM
Thanks you for all the comment.
There are different meanings. When I create my picture i didn't see the nacked wowen as a nudity but as a part of the composition. The composition is like a sculpture.
For exemple when you do a sculpture and you pose (to show the nature of the "form", The most beautiful is human form, the most estethic) your model and the texture is marbel it will accepted. What the difference? Only the texture. So we can say that a nudity is a nude only when the model looks like a real person? It was also a big discussion for 120 year in France. A lot of picture and sculpture was refused because of the nudity.
I posted long time ago " the spirit of the hill" The model was nacked but the texture was from Stone. Some people will see nudity on it for sure. Where is the difference?